Southern Poverty Law Center

What exactly does that mean? It sounds to me like some dam fool strung together a bunch of words that are meant to sound impressive, but mean absolutely nothing. About like the subject line in a SPAM email put together by somebody who doesn’t speak English.

Shall we parse it?

Southern Poverty. Are they fer it or agin it? Since they sound like a bunch of Yankees, my guess is that they are fer it, and we deserve it anyway.

Poverty Law. Based on what I’ve seen on their website, they have about the poorest set of lawyers, so maybe this makes sense.

Law Center. Again, their version of the law isn’t Center, but decidedly left. As 180 degrees out as you can get.

Southern Poverty Law Center. Even put together, it doesn’t make sense. Are they trying to fight poverty by suing it? Or maybe they expect poverty not to be able to afford a lawyer anyway?

A friend of mine sent me this link this morning; what a way to ruin a Wednesday.

I almost hate to include the link and increase these idiots traffic, but I figure it this way: One you need to see the drivel tehat passes for news, and I figure if half of my readers follow the link it will only increase their traffic but maybe 3 hits.

I read the basics of what they were saying and responded with this email:

I am angry that we have a minority president. Not because of his racial minority, but because of his ideological minority. Had ANYBODY put a viable candidate (Hillary Clinton is the BEST the Dems had?!?! And don’t get me started on McCain- the only thing keeping him from being a Democrat is the fact they probably don’t really want him) we would not be stuck with this socialist in the White House.

But see, that is the usefulness of a minority president. No matter how crappy his ideas, anyone who is against his policies is a ‘RACIST’. Any group formed to counter his proposals to slide us into socialism are “dangerous’; ‘violent’ and ‘anti-American’.

Do you think for a minute that had Hillary gotten the final nod (had the ass kissing media actually questioned any of Obama’s qualifications) from the Dems and was now in the Oval Office, that things would be different? Except instead of being racists, any opposition to her policies would have made us sexist.

I really don’t think the militia groups disappeared in the last 8 years; they just didn’t fit the MSM narrative (kinda like all the homeless disappear when a Democrat is President, and come crawling back out the shelters once the Republicans are back in- NOBODY is homeless when the Dems are in charge). I don’t think they are any more dangerous than they were 8 years ago (and of the hundreds of militia groups there are probably the same number of nut cases as there are in the general population. Maybe less, because I doubt any of them are Democrats), I don’t think there are more of them and I certainly don’t think they are the rebirth of the KKK because we have a minority president.

They are the same as they were 10 years ago. Folks who want to keep their Constitutional rights (ALL of them, not just the ones convenient for the government to let us have), and to be left the Hell alone by a meddling Federal Politburo.

Hell, if those are the criteria, then I must be militia material. Do they have a local recruiting office or do I need to find one in Idaho?

Sorry for the rant, but this outfit makes it sound like it is the people outside of Washington who are destroying the American way of life- not the people inside the I-495 Beltway.

And I mean it.